Ajdin Đidić – Realism in Turkish Foreign Policy Towards Syrian Refugees
Abstract: Normatively speaking, a rather disconcerting side of the contemporary refugee issue has been emphasized in this work – a situation which became especially obvious with the recent refugee accord between EU and Turkey. It is explained and elaborated how refugees have been caught in a rather precarious situation ‘between the rock and a hard place’ or in other words how they were exploited in favor of promoting each side’s own state-oriented objectives. In turn, these objectives have been analyzed from realist theoretical outlook – an outlook which was methodologically best corresponding to a set of independent variables on all three levels of analysis. The paper focuses more on the Turkish side and the articular, individual actors, thus intertwining levels of analysis in order to situate the Syrian refugees into a wider scope of political events.
Key words: Turkey, refugees, European Union
“Turkey: Illegal Mass Returns of Syrian Refugees Expose Fatal Flaws in EUTurkey Deal.” Amnesty International. April 1, 2016.
Ahmaddoun, Souad. 2014. “Turkey’s Policy toward Syrian Refugees: Domestic Repercussions and the Need for International Support.” German
Institute for International and Security Affairs.
Davutoglu, Ahmet. 2008. “Turkey’s Foreign Policy Vision: An Assessment of 2007.” Insight Turkey 10 (1): 77-96.
Zalewski, Piotr. “How Turkey Went From ‘Zero Problems’ to Zero Friends.” Foreign Policy. August 22, 2013. http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/08/22/
Vol. 3 (1) 2017.
Ajdin Đidić – Realism in Turkish Foreign Policy Towards Syrian Refugees how-turkey-went-from-zero-problems-to-zero-friends/.
Waltz, Kenneth. 2001. Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
Morgenthau, Hans. 2005. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Schmitt, Carl. 2007. The Concept of the Political. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Holliday, Joseph. 2012. “Syria’s Armed Opposition.” Institute for the Study of War, Middle East Security Report 3.
Mearsheimer, John. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Keohane, Robert, and Lisa Martin. 1995. “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory.” International Security 20 (1): 39-51.
Kosebalaban, Hasan. 2011. Turkish Foreign Policy: Islam, Nationalism and Globalization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Toros Emre. 2013. “Social Indicators and Voting: The Turkish Case.” Social Indicators Research 115 (3): 1011-1029.
Onis, Ziya. 2011. “Multiple Faces of the “New” Turkish Foreign Policy: Underlying Dynamics and a Critique.” Insight Turkey 13 (1): 47-65.
Millman, Brock. 1995. “Turkish Foreign and Strategic Policy 1934-42.” Middle Eastern Studies 31 (3): 483-508.
Hale, William. 2013. Turkish Foreign Policy Since 1774. Abingdon: Rootledge.
Carkoglu, Ali. 2009. The Rising Tide of Conservatism in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
Modebadze, Valeri, and Fatih Mehmet Sayin. 2015. “Why Should Turkey Join the European Union: Arguments in Favor of Turkish Membership.”
Institute for Research and European Studies, Journal of Liberty and International Affairs 1 (2).
Emerson, Michael. 2004. “Has Turkey Fulfilled the Copenhagen Political Criteria?.” Centre for European Policy Studies, CEPS Policy Brief 48.
Onis, Ziya, and Suhnaz, Yilmaz. 2009. “Between Europeanization and Euro-Asianism: Foreign Policy Activism in Turkey During the AKP Era.” Turkish Studies 10 (1): 7-24.
Davutoglu, Ahmet. 2010. “Turkey’s Zero – Problems Foreign Policy.” Foreign Policy, May 20. http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/05/20/turkeys-zeroproblems-foreign-policy/.
Akyol, Mustafa. “Who killed Turkey-PKK peace process?.” Al Monitor. August 4, 2015, http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/08/